i watched a documentary on fashion designer karl lagerfeld recently and despite my feeling creeped out by him through most of the film, he was indelibly provocative in his interview segments. he arrested me in his commentary on cliches and absolutely raised my cliche consciousness. for that, i appreciated him on a level completely independent of his fashion legacy.
cliches are not something i thought much about prior to this film. the term cliche refers to an idea, an expression, or an element of a work of art that has been overused or played out to the point of rendering it a stereotype, impotent. in modern culture, a cliche often is an action or expression that is expected or predictable.
mr, lagerfeld spoke quite stridently about the importance of not being a cliche, as an individual or in a relationship. cliches do not allow for
forward movement, certainly no individual expression.
because of their nature, cliches are an abdication of original expression or vitality or exploration or fluidity or all things that are the life-force of growth--they create conformity, boredom. cliches beget beigeness of being.
now, when i notice what strikes me as a cliche in a photograph or a person or myself, i am grateful for the consciousness raising. perhaps cliche consciousness is at
the core of how to live fully. to choose to consciously live in the fringes, at the edges, but not for the sake of being different or even extreme, for that is a cliche in itself. fringes and edges do not need to be extremes... they can simply be the more intensely yummy crusty outer edges of the pot of oatmeal in which groups who are comfortable in subverting their individuality lump themselves into. choosing to be a cliche may seem a safe option but i see it as riskier in that the outcome can feel muted and muting. choosing to avoid being a cliche and instead living a life of exploring, questioning, discovering--much richer in vitality.
p.s. another takeaway i gleaned from mr. lagerfeld was his advice to not hold on to our possessions. we can carry
them all with us in our mind and therefore always have them with us. it's a comforting idea. particularly when you consider how tenuous possessions can be. hurricanes, floods, accidents, bankruptcies, travel, relationships--they can all compromise our ability to maintain our possessions. and ultimately, possessions are not what constitute who we are. even if they are irreplaceable, they are not vital to our well-being like health and love are. i must, however, note that this nugget from mr. lagerfeld is quite ironic seeing as though he has storage facilities of previously favored fashion and households of books and valuables. but i include this wisdom from mr. lagerfeld here because, like cliche consciousness, it liberates us. and for me, tools that enhance our personal freedoms to live our truest and fullest lives, are invaluable.